The idleness convolute seems in each passage to detail the gradations of
idleness in any given experience, with elements of work and idleness in each. Thus m2a,2 talks about how idleness can be seen as a work-preparedness
required for reading news or nightlife, or, that is, two social institutions
where idleness forms an integral part of their functioning. Perhaps we could
never see the flaneur as part of any institution, but here that is exactly what
is going on, even if at a very abstract level. The next passage, m2a,3,
illustrates how idleness in fact works to produce the news, with "waiting
around" that finally produces informational content, as well as
photographs. The "get ready" and "shoot" paralleling the intervalic hunting done by the
student, the reading practices Benjamin himself engaged in while constructing
the Arcades Project.
m2a,5 accentuates the
theme of how one experience may appear to be the same as a different experience
to an "outsider," or how work experience may appear to be immediate
experience, when it really isn't. The question here is what distinguishes the
two, with the passage picking up from m2a,3 and saying that work or long
experience has "continuity, a sequence," like "get ready"
being followed by "shoot" in the creation of news. Here however this
continuity forms a substrate out of which immediate experience arises, giving the
appearance that something like idleness is just that, and not something that in
fact has "behind" it a whole series of events that are work-related
(take that to the boss!). Seen closely and for what they are, there is a
transparency of work into idleness and vice versa, both relying on the same
material on which to base experience. All this accounts for the disappearance
of idleness into work in bourgeois society.
No comments:
Post a Comment