The reason close
readings make sense with the Arcades
Project is that's exactly what the citational is: it relies on or is
oriented toward, it has a worldview of, using what is already here or existent
in the world, what has declared itself to be. That's the way in which it is
generative. Citation takes what is already in
the world and sees other worlds through whatever that is, it looks at how nominally 'other' things define a universe. This is a way to sidestep the compromised self,
as least initially, if such a self exists, even as the full subjectivity of the
self returns, and very obviously, in the act of reading, the act of imagining
what is in front of one. But that's the basic move, to take what already
exists, which is why it relates so well to curation (or non-curation), because it
is a placing together, a pulling out of the flow, a showing that is a reading,
a collection, a translation. How does one read the times, where we are, how
does one tell an old story?
No comments:
Post a Comment